MMI 402 – Introduction to Clinical Thinking
Course Description:This course provides students with insight into the clinical care process. It is designed for students not previously involved in clinical medicine as a nurse, pharmacist, or physician, as well as those trained in medicine outside the U.S. Course content will include some basic medical terminology and introductory psychophysiology. Topics include eliciting information from patients, synthesizing the history and physical examination, decision making for ordering tests, establishing diagnoses, treatment planning, integrating evidence-based medicine, and using an intelligent medical record in a complex environment.
What I Learned:
Similar to MedInf 401, this class was required for students entering the MMI program without prior clinical experience. I found the class to be very informative with its primary focus centered on clinical diagnosis of disease. I learned about the clinical encounter and the dialog that occurs between a patient and a physician. Namely, it is a guided process whereby the physician establishes a trusting relationship and guides the patient to discuss presenting symptoms, while prompting for clues that help determine a diagnosis. While the dialog is occurring, the physician is at the same time performing an analysis on the information available in order to understand the problem so that a proper diagnosis can be determined. The analysis process starts with a review of the patient’s history, their chief complaint, and physical symptoms. I appreciated having an MD as an instructor, as I learned first-hand from his years of experience. It is interesting to learn that while physicians receive a great deal of book training, interpersonal skills are not a focus of their formal training, and that this is learned mostly in practicing.
A key take away for me was the realization of how much demand we place on our practicing physicians. Primary care physicians (PCPs) especially play such a critical role in our healthcare delivery as they are the most direct means to care that most individuals have. With the growing demand for healthcare services, the time that a physician has to spend with a patient is limited. On average, most interactions are between 15-20 minutes. Thus, in order to be effective in collection and review of all the clues, a physician must leverage healthcare IT tools such as electronic medical records (EMR), computerized physician order entry (CPOE), and clinical decision support systems (CDSS). This ignited my passion in Medical Informatics, and it gave me a perspective on how I could contribute to the industry by using my valuable technical background to bridge the clinical and technical worlds.
I also enjoyed learning about diagnostic tools such as Dxplain, MedCalc and WebMD. I also gained a greater appreciation for the complexity that goes into development of tools like these, and their value in terms of evidence based medicine practices. By leveraging integration with these tools between EMRs, CPOE and CDSS, I discovered that the industry could really increase the effectiveness of our primary care physicians. I was also given an introductory exposure to biostatistical principles, and I learned about 2×2 tables, sensitivity, specificity, prevelance, and predictive modeling. Biostatistical theory is all encompassed in the types of tools that aim to predict diagnosis of a disease and specifically used to minimize misdiagnosis.
After gaining a better understanding of the diagnosis process and science behind it, it became easier for me to understand how medical error occurs. Many of the readings, in fact, focused the consequences of misdiagnosis and underscored the importance quality outcomes.
After completing the course, I felt I had a well laid foundation on the clinical side, and better appreciation for the clinicians I would work alongside with for the remainder of the program. In retrospect, I found myself frequently referring back to the journal articles and texts that were covered in this course. Indeed, the biostatistical focus was of critical importance later when it aided me to understand MedInf 403 andMedInf 409Additionally, I received my first exposure to the Galter Health Sciences Library available through the Feinberg School of Medicine in this class. Through the library, I was taught how to do medical research and to explore research like other clinical professionals using PubMed, Ovid ,Medline and the MeSH databases. These critical research skills would add to the fundamental skills that all Medical Informaticists need, and it helped me further to be successful in the program via my many class research papers.
Group Final Paper
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Tool (FMEA). (2004). Retrieved from Institute for Healthcare Improvement: http://app.ihi.org/Workspace/tools/fmea/
Baker, L. H., O’Connell, D., & Platt, F. W. (2005, November 15). “What Else?” Setting the Agenda for the Clinical Interview. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143(10), pp. 769-770. Retrieved from http://www.annals.org/content/143/10/766.extract
Blumenthal, D., & Tavenner, M. (2010). The “Meaningful Use” Regulation for Electronic Health Records. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363(6), 501-504. Retrieved from http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1006114
Bobb, A., Gleason, K., Husch, M. R., Feinglass, J., Yarnold, P. R., & Noskin, G. A. (2004, April 12). The Epidemiology of Prescribing Errors: The Potential Impact of Computerized Presriber Order Entry. Archives of Internal Medicine, pp. 785-792. Retrieved from http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/164/7/785
California Healthcare Foundation. (2010, April). Clinical Documentation: EHR Deployment Techniques. Retrieved from http://www.chcf.org/~/media/MEDIA%20LIBRARY%20Files/PDF/C/PDF%20ClinicalDocumentationEHRDeploymentTechniques.pdf
Chassin, M. R., & Becher, E. C. (2002). The Wrong Patient. Annals of Internal Medicine, 136, 850-852. Retrieved from http://www.annals.org/content/136/11/826.full.pdf
Fontelo, P., Liu, F., & Ackerman, M. (2005). askMEDLINE: a free-text, natural language query tool for MEDLINE/PubMed. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making, 1-6. doi: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1079856/pdf/1472-6947-5-5.pdf
Gandhi, T. K. (2005). Fumbled Handoffs: One Dropped Ball after Another. Annals of Internal Medicine, 142(5), 352-358. Retrieved from http://www.annals.org/content/142/5/352.full.pdf
Giustini, D., & Barsky, E. (2005). A look at Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scirus: comparisons and recommendations. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association(26), 85-89. doi: http://pubs.chla-absc.ca/doi/pdf/10.5596/c05-030
Goldman, L., & Kirtane, A. J. (2003, December 16). Triage of Patients with Acute Chest Pain and Possible Cardiac Ischemia: The Elusive Search for Diagnostic Perfection. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139(12), 987-995. Retrieved from http://www.annals.org/content/139/12/987.full.pdf+html
Halkin, A., Reichman, J., Schwaber, M., Paltiel, O., & Brezis, M. (1998). Likelihood ratios: getting diagnostic testing into perspective. Oxford Journals, 91(4), 247-258. doi:10.1093/qjmed/91.4.247
Heidenreich, P. A. (2009). Assessing the Value of a Diagnostic Test. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(14), 1262-1264. Retrieved from http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/169/14/1262
Henderson, J. (2005). Google Scholar: A source for clinicians? Canadian Medical Association, 172(12), 1549-1550. doi:10.1503/cmaj.050404
Humair, J.-P., Revaz, S. A., Bovier, P., & Stalder, H. (2006). Management of Acute Pharyngitis in Adults: Reliability of Rapid Streptococcal Tests and Clinical Findings. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 640-644. Retrieved from http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/166/6/640.pdf
Hunt, D. L., Jaeschke, R., & McKibbon, K. A. (2000). User’s Guides to the Medical Literature XXI: Using Electronic Health Information Resources in Evidence-Based Practice. Journal of American Medical Association, 283(14), 1875-1879.
King, D. B., Dickinson, J. A., Boulton, M.-R., & Toumpas, C. (2005). Clinical skills texbooks fail evidence-based examination. Evidence Based Medicine, 10, 131-132. doi:10.1136/ebm.10.5.131
Le Gal, G., Righini, M., Roy, P.-M., Sanchez, O., Aujesky, D., Bounameaux, H., & Perrier, A. (2006). Prediction of Pulmonary Embolism in the Emerrgency Department: The Revised Geneva Score. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144, 166-171. Retrieved from http://www.annals.org/content/144/3/165.full.pdf+html
Liebovitz, D. (2009). Health Care Information Technology. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(10), 924-926. Retrieved from http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/169/10/924
Makou, G. P., Zick, A. M., & Green, M. M. (2007). An Evidence-Based Perspective on Greetings in Medical Encounters2. Achives of Internal Medicine, 167, 1172-1176. Retrieved from http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/167/11/1172.pdf
McDonald, C. J. (2006). Computerization Can Create Safety Hazards: A Bar-Coding Near Miss. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144, 510-516. Retrieved from http://www.annals.org/content/144/7/510.full.pdf
McGinn, T., Moore, C., & Ho, W. (2002). Practice Corner: Using Clinical Prediction Rules. Evidence Based Medicine, 7, 132-134. doi: http://ebm.bmj.com/content/7/5/132.full.pdf
Mendu, M. L., McAvay, G., Lampert, R., Stoehr, J., & Tinetti, M. E. (2009). Yield of Diagnostic Tests in Evaluating Syncopal Episodes in Older Patients. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(14), 1299-1305. Retrieved from http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/169/14/1299.pdf
National Research Council (US) Committee on Engaging the Computer Science Research Community in Health Care Informatics. (2009). Computational Technology for Effective Health Care: Immediate Steps and Strategic Directions. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=computational%20technology%20for%20effective%20health%20care%3A%20immediate%20steps%20and%20strategic%20directions&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nlm.nih.gov%2Fpubs%2Freports%2Fcomptech_prepub.pdf
Richardson, W. S., & Wilson, M. C. (2002). Textbook descriptions of disease–Where’s the Beef? Evidence Based Medicine, 7, 100-102. doi:10.1136/ebm.7.4.100
Schiff, G. D., & Bates, D. W. (2010, March 23). Can Electronic Clinical Documentation Help Prevent Diagnostic Errors? The New England Journal of Medicine, 362(12), 1066-1069. Retrieved from http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp0911734
Smith, A. M. (2004). An examination of PubMed’s ability to disambiguate subject queries and journal title queries. Journal of the Medical Library Association(92(1)), 97-100. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC314110/pdf/i0025-7338-092-01-0097.pdf
Thomas, E. J., & Brennan, T. (2010). Diagnostic Adverse Events: On to Chapter 2. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(12), 1021-1022. Retrieved from http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/170/12/1021
Wachter, R. M. (2010). Patient Safety at Ten: Unmistakable Progress, Troubling Gaps. Health Affairs, 29(1), 165-173. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0785
Zwaan, L., Bruijne, M., Wagner, C., Thijs, A., Smits, M., van der Wal, G., & Timmermans, D. R. (2010). Patient Record Review of the Incidence, Consequences, and Causes of Diagnostic Adverse Events. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(12), 1015-1021. Retrieved from http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/170/12/1015.pdf